FSUgradLSUfan
Freshman
Posts: 651 
NFL: Saints
College: FSU and LSU
|
Post by FSUgradLSUfan on Feb 8, 2024 12:26:26 GMT -5
by asking; why would you think that is something impossible or hard to do? He's supposed to be someone who does research to bring the truth like he claims. Instead he just made the claim and millions of his viewers believe him. I'm sure that he will make a correction soon and his millions of followers will accept his sincere apology. Liberals complaining about truth in media is really funny. You asked a question which I thought you were being sincere about and it was answered, and your response was to change the subject to make it about me. |
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 14:00:37 GMT -5
how would carlson even know who tried to get an interview with putin? Then why make the claim to begin with??? because he thought no one had. afterall theres been a deplatforming of russian media. |
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 14:04:08 GMT -5
You not being able to follow your own post it's not my problem. Putin's already faced the American Media many times. If Tucker Carlson's interview is going to be the most watched in history, that means Tucker Carlson is going to profit. Isn't that a problem? Putin's already faced the American Media many times.yes, before he invaded Ukraine, now he's scared of the tough questions Whatever the situation, you're going to make an excuse for both Tucker Carlson in his dishonesty, or for Putin for being scared now to interview with real journalists. they feel tucker will be fair and impartial. so apparently its not a problem. putin's interviewed with western journalists many times, you calling him scared is silly. you haven't even seen the interview yet, and you are already calling tucker dishonest. |
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 14:06:28 GMT -5
Because he wasn't aware that any had. So he didn't ask, he didn't research, but he made it a very big part of his promotion for the interview... seems like something a propogandist would do, not a journalist. he was mistaken. who cares, it's just a minor issue. libs are just angry because they want to control the narrative. |
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 14:17:22 GMT -5
how would carlson even know who tried to get an interview with putin? carlson is simply anti-war, and thinks taxpayer dollar could be put to better use elsewhere, as opposed to starting a nuclear war. he's criticized putin many times, rarely if ever praised him. liberals just have a weird obsession with putin like they do trump. the congress doesn't want to give ukraine anymore funding because they know it's a lost cause. carlson had the #1 show on cable news, is the top journalist in media, and his interview with putin likely will be the most watched in history. not sure why you think putin not wanting dirtbags to profit off him makes him scared. you know who is scared is that doddering old fool joe biden. he's the one that should be meeting with putin. Lol holy crap, you are full on drinking the Russian propo Kool aid. Did you forget the time in court when literally, one of Tucker Carlson's defenses against the consequences of his actions as a member of Fox News was that no one in in their right mind should take anything he says as literal fact? Tucker Carson, for years, did the behest of a company that masquerades itself as news while defending themselves in court as entertainment and not actual journalism. Tucker Carlson, by definition, is not a journalist. tucker wasn't in court, foxnews was. the case was dismissed. so your crying because tucker is interviewing putin, even though many other journalist already have? |
|
cityofchamps
Sophomore
Posts: 1,880
NFL: Steelers
NBA: Sixers
NHL: Pens
MLB: Buccos
College: H2P!
|
Post by cityofchamps on Feb 8, 2024 15:04:10 GMT -5
Lol holy crap, you are full on drinking the Russian propo Kool aid. Did you forget the time in court when literally, one of Tucker Carlson's defenses against the consequences of his actions as a member of Fox News was that no one in in their right mind should take anything he says as literal fact? Tucker Carson, for years, did the behest of a company that masquerades itself as news while defending themselves in court as entertainment and not actual journalism. Tucker Carlson, by definition, is not a journalist. tucker wasn't in court, foxnews was. the case was dismissed. so your crying because tucker is interviewing putin, even though many other journalist already have? No, I'm calling it what it is. Carlson is letting himself become a mouthpiece for Putin's regime, which has already detained close to 20 journalists as of last weekend leading up to Carlson's visit, including WSJ's Evan Gershkovic. Gershovic is being wrongly held after attempting to cover an anti-war protest in Russia. Putin doesn't want ANY anti-war sentiment from inside the country getting out to western media. None. He wants as many idiots like you as possible believing that there is a possibility that he is justified in his illegal invasion of Ukraine where is is committing genocide and freely committing war crimes for his own ego, all because he wants all of the territory that previous Russian leaders legitimately either lost, gave away, or sold, back. Putin is now hinting that he may try to invade Alaska because he believes it was illegally sold to the US, even going so far as to putting out a decree saying it was illegally sold to us. Do you agree with him? The things he is saying about Alaska now are in the same breath and tone he said about Crimea and Ukraine before he illegally invaded them. |
|
FSUgradLSUfan
Freshman
Posts: 651
NFL: Saints
College: FSU and LSU
|
Post by FSUgradLSUfan on Feb 8, 2024 15:11:51 GMT -5
If Tucker Carlson's interview is going to be the most watched in history, that means Tucker Carlson is going to profit. Isn't that a problem? Putin's already faced the American Media many times.yes, before he invaded Ukraine, now he's scared of the tough questions Whatever the situation, you're going to make an excuse for both Tucker Carlson in his dishonesty, or for Putin for being scared now to interview with real journalists. they feel tucker will be fair and impartial. so apparently its not a problem. putin's interviewed with western journalists many times, you calling him scared is silly. you haven't even seen the interview yet, and you are already calling tucker dishonest. so western media used to be impartial/fair up until Putin decided to invade Ukraine and they were ok with western media/MSM profitting. putin's interviewed with western journalists many times, you calling him scared is silly.he wasn't scared, now he is. But I can see why he's not scared of Tucky Swanson Carlson the 3rd you haven't even seen the interview yet, and you are already calling tucker dishonest.because he is dishonest lol; and I am calling him dishonest for his announcement and claiming western media (as proof they are bad actors) haven't tried to interview Putin. You know that is what I am referring to because I specifically said you're defending Carlson in his dishonesty, which you are doing. You asked how it would be possible for a journalist to find out something, and when explained you decided to go for the personal attack. |
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 15:30:21 GMT -5
tucker wasn't in court, foxnews was. the case was dismissed. so your crying because tucker is interviewing putin, even though many other journalist already have? No, I'm calling it what it is. Carlson is letting himself become a mouthpiece for Putin's regime, which has already detained close to 20 journalists as of last weekend leading up to Carlson's visit, including WSJ's Evan Gershkovic. Gershovic is being wrongly held after attempting to cover an anti-war protest in Russia. Putin doesn't want ANY anti-war sentiment from inside the country getting out to western media. None. He wants as many idiots like you as possible believing that there is a possibility that he is justified in his illegal invasion of Ukraine where is is committing genocide and freely committing war crimes for his own ego, all because he wants all of the territory that previous Russian leaders legitimately either lost, gave away, or sold, back. Putin is now hinting that he may try to invade Alaska because he believes it was illegally sold to the US, even going so far as to putting out a decree saying it was illegally sold to us. Do you agree with him? The things he is saying about Alaska now are in the same breath and tone he said about Crimea and Ukraine before he illegally invaded them. So you're upset because the Liberals might not be controlling the narrative about Russia, and you don't think people can think for themselves? Maybe you should wait and watch the interview before you criticize. Putin has said nothing about taking Alaska back. Crimea at a large Russian population, even Obama admitted that. |
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 15:33:41 GMT -5
they feel tucker will be fair and impartial. so apparently its not a problem. putin's interviewed with western journalists many times, you calling him scared is silly. you haven't even seen the interview yet, and you are already calling tucker dishonest. so western media used to be impartial/fair up until Putin decided to invade Ukraine and they were ok with western media/MSM profitting. putin's interviewed with western journalists many times, you calling him scared is silly.he wasn't scared, now he is. But I can see why he's not scared of Tucky Swanson Carlson the 3rd you haven't even seen the interview yet, and you are already calling tucker dishonest.because he is dishonest lol; and I am calling him dishonest for his announcement and claiming western media (as proof they are bad actors) haven't tried to interview Putin. You know that is what I am referring to because I specifically said you're defending Carlson in his dishonesty, which you are doing. You asked how it would be possible for a journalist to find out something, and when explained you decided to go for the personal attack. I've never said Western media is impartial. Why would Putin be scared of what western media is already saying about him? Putin likely has other things to be doing besides sitting down with a bunch of biased journalists. Tucker saying what he thought was true is not being dishonest. |
|
ron
Sophomore
Posts: 2,386
|
Post by ron on Feb 8, 2024 15:49:52 GMT -5
CNN) — Russian President Vladimir Putin should face a war crimes inquiry for Moscow’s brutal assault on Mariupol, which left thousands of people dead, countless buildings destroyed and was followed by a widespread campaign of Russification, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in a new report analyzing the devastation wrought on the Ukrainian city.
—-
If you support a murderous dictator that should be facing war crimes, what does that say about you?
|
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 15:53:48 GMT -5
CNN) — Russian President Vladimir Putin should face a war crimes inquiry for Moscow’s brutal assault on Mariupol, which left thousands of people dead, countless buildings destroyed and was followed by a widespread campaign of Russification, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in a new report analyzing the devastation wrought on the Ukrainian city. —- If you support a murderous dictator that should be facing war crimes, what does that say about you? Good let's haul Vladimir zelenski, Obama, Biden, and George Bush up there too. |
|
ron
Sophomore
Posts: 2,386
|
Post by ron on Feb 8, 2024 15:54:21 GMT -5
CNN) — Russian President Vladimir Putin should face a war crimes inquiry for Moscow’s brutal assault on Mariupol, which left thousands of people dead, countless buildings destroyed and was followed by a widespread campaign of Russification, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in a new report analyzing the devastation wrought on the Ukrainian city. —- If you support a murderous dictator that should be facing war crimes, what does that say about you? Good let's haul Vladimir zelenski, Obama, Biden, and George Bush up there too. Clownish. You missed one |
|
FSUgradLSUfan
Freshman
Posts: 651
NFL: Saints
College: FSU and LSU
|
Post by FSUgradLSUfan on Feb 8, 2024 16:00:18 GMT -5
so western media used to be impartial/fair up until Putin decided to invade Ukraine and they were ok with western media/MSM profitting. putin's interviewed with western journalists many times, you calling him scared is silly.he wasn't scared, now he is. But I can see why he's not scared of Tucky Swanson Carlson the 3rd you haven't even seen the interview yet, and you are already calling tucker dishonest.because he is dishonest lol; and I am calling him dishonest for his announcement and claiming western media (as proof they are bad actors) haven't tried to interview Putin. You know that is what I am referring to because I specifically said you're defending Carlson in his dishonesty, which you are doing. You asked how it would be possible for a journalist to find out something, and when explained you decided to go for the personal attack. I've never said Western media is impartial. Why would Putin be scared of what western media is already saying about him? Putin likely has other things to be doing besides sitting down with a bunch of biased journalists. Tucker saying what he thought was true is not being dishonest. you didn't say it, but you claimed the reason Putin wouldn't interview with western media is because they are not impartial, yet he did plenty of interviews with them before... I guess because he found them to be impartial before. This is what I mean by you making excuses and buying into Putin's excuses, it makes you have to twist in your ideology and you do it in whatever way means that Putin is right. He's already shown he is willing to sit down with a bunch of biased journalists, when he so macholy did before he invaded Ukraine. I guess he didn't have anything important to do before he invaded Ukraine. Tucker saying what he thought was true is not being dishonest. how do you know he thought that to be true? Why would anyone rely on someone to give a good interview who either A. is being deceitful to push his narrative or B. makes such a bold claim without doing any sort of fact checking? |
|
|
|
Post by Sir Tinley on Feb 8, 2024 16:02:24 GMT -5
Good let's haul Vladimir zelenski, Obama, Biden, and George Bush up there too. Clownish. You missed one Who did he miss? |
|
|
|
Post by Sir Tinley on Feb 8, 2024 16:07:17 GMT -5
Which wasn't true, the Kremlin has denied a bunch of requests for interviews since the start of the war, With who? |
|
|
|
Post by Sir Tinley on Feb 8, 2024 16:13:44 GMT -5
Lol holy crap, you are full on drinking the View propo Kool aid. Did you forget the time in court when literally, one of Tucker Carlson's defenses against the consequences of his actions as a member of Fox News was that no one in in their right mind should take anything he says as literal fact? All opinion people take this legal path (yep, every one of them) Rachel Maddows is among the "all". Despite your massive but intense failure, your attempt at making a point went down in flames. Tucker Carson, for years, did the behest of a company that masquerades itself as news while defending themselves in court as entertainment and not actual journalism. Tucker Carlson, by definition, is not a journalist. Everyone masquerades as news. You can't name a true news organization (no, the view doesn't cut it either). The fact is, the traditional definition of "journalist" is extinct. |
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 16:25:41 GMT -5
I've never said Western media is impartial. Why would Putin be scared of what western media is already saying about him? Putin likely has other things to be doing besides sitting down with a bunch of biased journalists. Tucker saying what he thought was true is not being dishonest. you didn't say it, but you claimed the reason Putin wouldn't interview with western media is because they are not impartial, yet he did plenty of interviews with them before... I guess because he found them to be impartial before. This is what I mean by you making excuses and buying into Putin's excuses, it makes you have to twist in your ideology and you do it in whatever way means that Putin is right. He's already shown he is willing to sit down with a bunch of biased journalists, when he so macholy did before he invaded Ukraine. I guess he didn't have anything important to do before he invaded Ukraine. Tucker saying what he thought was true is not being dishonest. how do you know he thought that to be true? Why would anyone rely on someone to give a good interview who either A. is being deceitful to push his narrative or B. makes such a bold claim without doing any sort of fact checking? putin interviewed with the major networks who in turn smeared him. why should he waste his time? unlike biden and zelensky, putin probably has other things to be doing. your only upset because tucker is interviewing him. i don't know, but it appears to be an honest mistake. why should i assume he lied? unless i just hated him? |
|
|
|
Post by wwjerryd on Feb 8, 2024 16:28:34 GMT -5
Then why make the claim to begin with??? because he thought no one had. afterall theres been a deplatforming of russian media. It’s his job to know. His job to ask. But Cucker Tarlson is so used to lying and having his audience believe him, he didn’t think twice about lying and not doing his job. |
|
ron
Sophomore
Posts: 2,386
|
Post by ron on Feb 8, 2024 16:38:39 GMT -5
A couple of weeks ago, I was watching video of people fighting on the street in Washington. A group of Trump guys surrounded an Antifa kid and started pounding the living shit out of him. It was three against one, at least. Jumping a guy like that is dishonorable obviously. It’s not how white men fight. Yet suddenly I found myself rooting for the mob against the man, hoping they’d hit him harder, kill him. I really wanted them to hurt the kid. I could taste it. Then somewhere deep in my brain, an alarm went off: this isn’t good for me. I’m becoming something I don’t want to be. The Antifa creep is a human being. Much as I despise what he says and does, much as I’m sure I’d hate him personally if I knew him, I shouldn’t gloat over his suffering. I should be bothered by it. I should remember that somewhere somebody probably loves this kid, and would be crushed if he was killed. If I don’t care about those things, if I reduce people to their politics, how am I better than he is? -Tucker Carlson
|
|
FSUgradLSUfan
Freshman
Posts: 651
NFL: Saints
College: FSU and LSU
|
Post by FSUgradLSUfan on Feb 8, 2024 16:48:06 GMT -5
you didn't say it, but you claimed the reason Putin wouldn't interview with western media is because they are not impartial, yet he did plenty of interviews with them before... I guess because he found them to be impartial before. This is what I mean by you making excuses and buying into Putin's excuses, it makes you have to twist in your ideology and you do it in whatever way means that Putin is right. He's already shown he is willing to sit down with a bunch of biased journalists, when he so macholy did before he invaded Ukraine. I guess he didn't have anything important to do before he invaded Ukraine. Tucker saying what he thought was true is not being dishonest. how do you know he thought that to be true? Why would anyone rely on someone to give a good interview who either A. is being deceitful to push his narrative or B. makes such a bold claim without doing any sort of fact checking? putin interviewed with the major networks who in turn smeared him. why should he waste his time? unlike biden and zelensky, putin probably has other things to be doing. your only upset because tucker is interviewing him. i don't know, but it appears to be an honest mistake. why should i assume he lied? unless i just hated him? I'm only upset about what? I'm only upset that tucker is interviewing him because tucker is interviewing him? lol "in turn smeared". No, he stopped doing interviews after he invaded Ukraine. He jails journalists he doesn't like and/or has them killed (those in his country). I'm sure you're ok with that though because you only like war mongers who are named Putin. Why does it "appear" to be an honest mistake? He is the person who is supposed to be getting to the bottom of things, yet he didn't do one ounce of due diligence. Why would you trust him to do his due diligence to ask the tough question to Putin? |
|
|
|
Post by castles made of sand... on Feb 8, 2024 18:09:31 GMT -5
putin interviewed with the major networks who in turn smeared him. why should he waste his time? unlike biden and zelensky, putin probably has other things to be doing. your only upset because tucker is interviewing him. i don't know, but it appears to be an honest mistake. why should i assume he lied? unless i just hated him? I'm only upset about what? I'm only upset that tucker is interviewing him because tucker is interviewing him? lol "in turn smeared". No, he stopped doing interviews after he invaded Ukraine. He jails journalists he doesn't like and/or has them killed (those in his country). I'm sure you're ok with that though because you only like war mongers who are named Putin. Why does it "appear" to be an honest mistake? He is the person who is supposed to be getting to the bottom of things, yet he didn't do one ounce of due diligence. Why would you trust him to do his due diligence to ask the tough question to Putin?
I'm willing to wait and see the interview before criticizing. |
|
ron
Sophomore
Posts: 2,386
|
Post by ron on Feb 8, 2024 18:16:43 GMT -5
I'm only upset about what? I'm only upset that tucker is interviewing him because tucker is interviewing him? lol "in turn smeared". No, he stopped doing interviews after he invaded Ukraine. He jails journalists he doesn't like and/or has them killed (those in his country). I'm sure you're ok with that though because you only like war mongers who are named Putin. Why does it "appear" to be an honest mistake? He is the person who is supposed to be getting to the bottom of things, yet he didn't do one ounce of due diligence. Why would you trust him to do his due diligence to ask the tough question to Putin?
I'm willing to wait and see the interview before criticizing. I always like to give a mass murderer the benefit of the doubt. |
|
FSUgradLSUfan
Freshman
Posts: 651
NFL: Saints
College: FSU and LSU
|
Post by FSUgradLSUfan on Feb 8, 2024 18:57:42 GMT -5
I'm only upset about what? I'm only upset that tucker is interviewing him because tucker is interviewing him? lol "in turn smeared". No, he stopped doing interviews after he invaded Ukraine. He jails journalists he doesn't like and/or has them killed (those in his country). I'm sure you're ok with that though because you only like war mongers who are named Putin. Why does it "appear" to be an honest mistake? He is the person who is supposed to be getting to the bottom of things, yet he didn't do one ounce of due diligence. Why would you trust him to do his due diligence to ask the tough question to Putin?
I'm willing to wait and see the interview before criticizing. You knew what I meant when I said he stopped giving interviews. I have not changed what I was talking about. I am not sure why you're playing these games, what's the point? |
|
ron
Sophomore
Posts: 2,386
|
Post by ron on Feb 8, 2024 20:04:08 GMT -5
Can’t wait to hear snerb and Tinley bitch about Biden’s special statement on classified material
Day is night
Right is wrong
Trump is persecuted
|
|
cityofchamps
Sophomore
Posts: 1,880
NFL: Steelers
NBA: Sixers
NHL: Pens
MLB: Buccos
College: H2P!
|
Post by cityofchamps on Feb 8, 2024 20:14:52 GMT -5
because he thought no one had. afterall theres been a deplatforming of russian media. It’s his job to know. His job to ask. But Cucker Tarlson is so used to lying and having his audience believe him, he didn’t think twice about lying and not doing his job. It's ironic how far he has fallen when he got his first job in media as a fact checker for a conservative journal published by The Heritage Foundation. |
|
